Taking a Closer Look at Greta Thunberg’s Speech
Must Be Validated From Scratch

News of a 16-year-old girl giving a speech at the U.N. in tears was reported around the world.




The Rise of the Global Warming Debate

Debates regarding global warming are heating up.

In September, Swedish environmental activist Greta Thunberg gave a speech at the United Nations Climate Action Summit. “You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words,” Thunberg said, denouncing representatives from each country. In December, Thunberg is scheduled to attend the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC COP25) taking place in Chili.




Media Promotes the Activist

Mass media around the world are blindly praising the 16-year-old girl.

On the other hand, various media report U.S. President Donald Trump as a “personification of evil” for his doubts about climate change and declaration to leave the Paris Climate Agreement. Here’s what the media argue: carbon dioxide (CO2) causes rapid climate change because of “scientific conclusion,” and those that deny it already have a vested interest in protecting their oil rights.


Background 1


Swaying Theory on CO2

However, is global warming theory really a “scientific conclusion?”

The story of global warming goes as follows. The 18th century Industrial Revolution quickly caused an increase in fossil fuels, which increased CO2 in the atmosphere and warmed the Earth.

On the contrary, much research shows that during the Middle Ages from 1100-1375, there existed a warmer climate than today on a global scale.

Why was it warmer at a time when treadwheels and water wheels were used in place of fossil fuels? Environmental activists remain silent on this mystery.

Another factor we can’t leave out is a discovery by climate researcher Dr. Michael Mann from Penn State University: the “hockey stick” graph (see above). This graph spread the theory of global warming by showing a sharp rise in average global temperature in the late 20th century after the Industrial Revolution.

In reality, it is pointed out that this graph is using a mathematical equation that allows any inputted data to form the same curve. Statisticians questioned the validity of the graph and revealed its error through a collaboration with other academics. The U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce reported Dr. Mann’s analysis method to be lacking in reliability. The graph that supposedly supported global warming was complete nonsense.

During trials, Dr. Mann refused to disclose the original data he used in creating the graph and lost the case.

Meanwhile, many academic papers show that ancient Earth, in which CO2 concentration was five times that of today, had almost the same temperature as modern times.

Well-known academics such as physicist William Happer claim that a higher CO2 concentration helps animals and plants grow well, and that “the net result of more CO2 will be strongly beneficial for humanity,” in a 2016 interview.

Happy Science CEO Master Ryuho Okawa stated the following during his English lecture in Canada on Oct. 6:

“[Carbon dioxide] means the plants of Earth can absorb a lot of energy from the air and they can spread a lot of a green in the world. The plants feed animals and after that, a lot of people can live on this Earth.”

There’s a hole in the theory stating that CO2 is the root of evil.


Hockey stick graph posted on Dr. Mann’s homepage.


Background 2


Behind the Theory Lies Communist Ideology

Why do environmental organizations keep instilling fear in people without inspecting their rebuttals?

The answer lies in communist and socialist beliefs.

The Soviet Union that embodied communist ideology collapsed in 1991. Left-wing activists shifted to a new field for their activity: environmental issues. They transitioned from being Marxists to becoming ecologists.

After the Soviet collapsed, first prime minister of the Czech Republic, Václav Klaus, gave a warning: “the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity at the beginning of the 21st century is not communism or its various softer variants. Communism was replaced by the threat of ambitious environmentalism.”

In other words, extreme environmental activists are infiltrating the world with their jealousy for the wealthy in the name of environmental protection and attempting to create an equality of poverty.

There are suspicious speculations behind Thunberg.

In September, Master Okawa investigated the spiritual existence influencing Thunberg. It was revealed through his spiritual reading that Vladimir Lenin, a Russian communist revolutionary who guided the creation of the Soviet Union, is influencing Thunberg. His objective became clear: to collapse developed countries.


Steps to Take Next


Developed Countries Should Aim for Further Economic Prosperity

To begin with, the theory of global warming must be validated from scratch.

Environmental protection activities without valid evidence will put a break on economic activities around the world. If it becomes severe, who will save people struggling with poverty in developing countries?

Master Okawa also declared the following statement in his Canada lecture:


“Billions of people are suffering from poverty. How can we solve this problem? Please think about that. It’s very important and it’s the mission of advanced countries.”

Further economic prosperity would allow development of newer, more efficient sources of clean energy. We need to prevent extreme environmental activities which are communist beliefs in disguise.


The ship of “Greenpeace,” an international environmental organization known for extreme activities. A flag written, “Change the energy! Not the climate!” is put up.
(photo: D_Zheleva/Shutterstock.com)
Taking a Closer Look at Greta Thunberg’s Speech
Copyright © IRH Press Co.Ltd. All Right Reserved.